SBC Leaders: Seekers of Justice or Just Opportunists?

Latest Posts

Provision: A Summary Critique

by edingess | Aug 8, 2022

Provisionism: A Summary Critique In this episode, I close out my rants on Provisionism with a summary critique. If Leighton Flowers and his provisionists followers want to object to provisionism being compared to Pelagianism, they need to specifically outline the...

Provisionism: On Free Will

by edingess | Mar 11, 2022

In this episode, I rant about Provisionism and its view of free will. I conclude that it is exegetically bankrupt, theologically baseless, logically incoherent, and a philosophical non-starter....

Provisionism: An Incoherent View of Divine Sovereignty

by edingess | Mar 5, 2022

In this episode, I rant about Leighton Flowers and the Provisionist's incoherent view of divine sovereignty. No one should hold to a system that is internally inconsistent with itself. Irrationalism is antithetical to Christian belief. ...

Provisionism’s Incoherent Doctrines of Regeneration and Election

by edingess | Feb 26, 2022

In this episode, I review the doctrines of Regeneration and Election as stated by Provisionism. As it turns out, both doctrines fail in that they prove to be logically incoherent and exegetically untenable. ...

Provisionism: An Incoherent Doctrine of Grace

by edingess | Jan 20, 2022

It is difficult if not impossible to get the gospel right if you get grace wrong. Provisionism gets grace terribly wrong. https://anchor.fm/edward-dingess/episodes/Provisionism-An-Incoherent-Doctrine-of-Grace-e1d70p9

Provisionism’s Incoherent Doctrine of The Atonement

by edingess | Jan 16, 2022

Provisionism claims to affirm the penal-substitutionary view of the atonement. On the other hand, Provisionism claims that Christ atoned for the sins of people who will not be saved in the end. These two propositions are contradictory to one another and reflect a...