A Response to Mike Licona, Bill Craig, Andy Stanley, et al. It is perfectly natural to expect that naturalistic atheistism would oppose the historic Christian doctrine of biblical inerrancy. And no one is taken by surprise when radical skeptics construct a fresh new way to reject the epistemic authority […]
Monthly Archives: March 2017
7 posts
In my interactions with atheists, one of the most common tactics I have observed is the claim that atheism is not a worldview. Atheism is not belief, but the absence of belief. It is not a claim, but the absence of a claim. Therefore, or so it goes, atheism does […]
I understand you’re trying to address three different people so I can understand the difficulty in doing so. There are a hundred things I could ask you from what you said but I want to ask you, from what you said, how you know god directly, and personally, and propositionally […]
The Euthyphro dilemma is often used by atheists to argue that the Christian understanding of morality either makes God subject to a greater morality that is independent from God or it makes God’s judgments concerning what is and is not moral merely arbitrary. This is not as difficult or complex as […]
The state of affairs in which we find ourselves as Christians is one of perpetual opposition. I have found that it is always healthier if one honestly and accurately sets expectations up front. Thi… Source: The Warring Christian
The state of affairs in which we find ourselves as Christians is one of perpetual opposition. I have found that it is always healthier if one honestly and accurately sets expectations up front. This way, at least we know what we are getting ourselves into. I don’t know about you, […]